Henri Squire vs Ivan Gakhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Sep at 02:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Squire vs I. Gakhov

 GER
1
Win
Played
1
Win

 RUS
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Squire 1 - 1 Gakhov
They have played 5 sets in total, with Henri Squire winning 2 and Ivan Gakhov winning 3. The last match between Henri Squire and Ivan Gakhov was at the Szczecin Challenger, 09-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Henri Squire getting the victory 4-6 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Squire | 1 | 
| Gakhov | 1 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Szczecin Challenger(09-09-25)
(Q3) BMW Open - Munich(04-14-24)
H. Squire vs I. Gakhov H2H Profile
H. Squire vs I. Gakhov Match Preview:
- Does recent form in second serve performance favor one player? Yes, Gakhov edges out with a 46.14% win rate compared to Squire’s 40.45%, indicating stronger second serve performance.
 - Regarding return game stats, Gakhov also holds a slight advantage, winning 48.82% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Squire’s 48.34%.
 - On first serve returns, Squire outperforms Gakhov, capturing 28% versus Gakhov’s 26.65%.
 - Under pressure, Gakhov has been slightly more resilient, saving 58.14% of breakpoints as opposed to Squire’s 56.57%.
 - Squire has a yearly win rate of 50.79%, while Gakhov surpasses this with 58.44%.
 - Considering surface, Squire excels on indoor hard courts with a 64% win rate, whereas Gakhov thrives on clay at 63%. Both show relatively weak performance on grass.
 - Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Squire having a higher win percentage (52.08%) than Gakhov (46.81%).
 - In head-to-head encounters, Gakhov has the upper hand, winning the only previous match convincingly in two sets.
 - Have Squire and Gakhov faced tiebreaks or deciding sets against each other? No, they have not encountered these scenarios yet.
 - Gakhov’s record in deciding sets, winning 60%, is notably better than Squire’s 29% over the last year.
 - Squire has played against slightly higher-ranked opponents on average, suggesting more challenging matchups.
 - In breakpoint conversion during recent form, Squire has the advantage, converting 35.48% of opportunities compared to Gakhov’s 32.86%.
 
Editorial Prediction (September 9, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the strengths and performance trends of both players, Gakhov currently demonstrates an advantage in second serve winning rates and breakpoint defense. These statistics are crucial indicators of potential success in upcoming matches.
Although Squire has shown a slightly better performance in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion, Gakhov's overall consistency and performance under pressure suggest he may handle pivotal moments more effectively.
Historically, Gakhov has dominated their sole head-to-head meeting, securing a straightforward victory, further underscoring his potential upper hand in this matchup.
Considering the gathered data, Gakhov appears most likely to triumph in the forthcoming tennis match.
Henri Squire vs Ivan Gakhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Squire vs I. Gakhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 | 
| 23 | Games Won | 21 | 
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 11 | 
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:37:43 | Average Match Time | 1:37:43 | 
| 71% (98/139) | 1st Serve % | 59% (86/145) | 
| 74% (73/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (60/86) | 
| 34% (14/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (27/59) | 
| 32% (6/19) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (5/16) | 
| 40% (58/145) | Return Points Win % | 37% (52/139) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) | 
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
H. Squire Recent Matches Played
I. Gakhov Recent Matches Played

H. Squire vs I. Gakhov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.40% (216/167) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.80% (546/352) | 
| 54.79% (486/401) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.02% (1222/884) | 
| 52.03% (4406/4062) | Games Win/Loss | 52.86% (10561/9417) | 
| 43.48% (10/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.26% (51/43) | 
| 55.35% (119/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.96% (476/280) | 
| 62.22% (84/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.43% (19/28) | 
| 30.00% (3/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 0.62 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 
| 2573 | Aces Total | 2676 | 
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 
| 1460 | Total Double Faults | 2056 | 
| 1:31:19 | Average Match Time | 1:23:11 | 
| 462.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 503.68 | 
| 62% (16053/25699) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30576/50376) | 
| 73% (11793/16053) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20988/30576) | 
| 47% (4512/9646) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9851/19800) | 
| 42% (1028/2420) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2268/5412) | 
| 38% (9859/25769) | Return Points Win % | 41% (21034/51410) | 
| 50.00% (5/5) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/4) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 75.00% (3/1) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 20.00% (2/8) | Main Tour W/L | 32.00% (8/17) | 
| 53.60% (119/103) | Challenger W/L | 50.50% (151/148) | 
| 64.29% (90/50) | Futures W/L | 67.84% (384/182) | 
| 57% (208/367) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (540/889) | 
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 
| 49% (66/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (156/287) | 
| 54% (67/123) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (180/314) | 
| 87% (193/167) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (516/449) | 
| 13% (193/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (516/66) | 
| 25% (190/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (382/95) |